Thursday, December 24, 2009

Sekiranya PR memerintah dan DAP dapat kuasa

Salam Tun,

I have always admired the way you stood up against Singapore and today I wish to add my views on the so-called Singapore's meritocracy policies.I was a Singaporean, born and bred for more than 35 years before deciding to seek a greener pasture in Malaysia. I’ve stayed here for more than 10 years and I am now proud to be called a Malaysian.

First and foremost let me declare that I do not harbor any vindictive feeling against the Singapore-PAP regime and I fully understand their endless bigotry policies against the minority community. I left for the same reason as many other professional Muslim/Malays - the government’s chauvinistic policies against the minority (Indian included). After all, PAP was formed by a group of elitist Chinese that paraded the theme of Malaysians-for-all slogan under the guise of meritocracy. Alas, my generation began to lament the fact that our forefathers had been too na├»ve to actually believe that pretences and false slogans can be translated into action by this elitist party. It may come as a surprise to many Malaysians but let me put the facts straight – Singapore is probably one of the most racist countries in the world and perhaps even more than Israel.

Since its independence in 1965, there has never been a single government policy that favors the Malay/Muslim community. Need proof? Let me begin by naming just a few of their ‘meritocracy’ policies – 1) demolition of mosques (from 93 mosques before separation and now 36); 2) admission quotas for minorities into national universities capped at 2% of student’s population (with an unofficial allocation of 2 students each in medicine and law while the rest are forced into the social sciences); 3) refusal to employ Malay/Muslims into the air force, navy and armed forces; 4) refusal to allow uniform Muslim civil servants to wear hijab; 5) refusal to allow Muslim school children to wear hijab in school; 6) demolition of Singapore’s last sultanate home; 7) refusal to allow muezzin call for prayers in mosques; 8) threat to close down three out of four existing madrasahs; 9) millions of tax payers money spent to promote Mandarin while none was allocated to promote the use of its national language Bahasa Kebangsaan (Malay language) as required under the constitution; 10) only two out of more than 300 pilots employed in the national carrier SIA are Malays; 11) only one out of 800 super-scale civil servants is a Malay; 12) there is never (and probably never will) be any permanent secretaries in any Ministries who are Malays - and this is just a tip of the iceberg. One needs to write a book to eloquently narrate the righteousness of Singapore’s so-called ‘meritocracy’ policies. Oh yes, and another ‘meritocracy’ policy which is the mother of all - the racial allocation of Malays into any single constituency that is capped to a maximum of 30%. Confused? Let me put it bluntly – the Malay population should not exceed more than 30% in any single constituency - so much for Malay political rights!

Now let’s compare with Malaysia. Do we hear the government capping entrants into local universities at 2%? Do we see the government preventing the Chinese or Indian community from moving into any constituency? Do we prevent Chinese or Indian individual from becoming a pilot at our national carrier? Has there been any policy to prohibit the Chinese and Indian community from joining the military? Do we prevent any community from praying or promoting their language or culture? Do we see the Malaysian’s authorities demolishing temples and Chinese shrines blatantly?

For those who herald Singapore as an example of meritocracy, my advice is to read your facts first and not concoct information based on half-truth, lies and untruth.


from my friend email....

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Bodohnya manusia bercakap..

Beberapa hari lepas, aku lepak ngan member2 aku, ada cina, india ngan budak sabah sarawak, truely Malaysian la...kitorang borak2 pasal macam2 perkara...tapi paling best kitorang berdebat tentang siapa penduduk asal Malaysia.

semua cakap pandangan masing-masing, ada cakap Melayu ni pendatang berasal dari selatan china la, Melayu ni muncul dari pertembungan bangsa cina n India la, Melayu ni datang dari Indon la...tapi kaum cina ngan india xleh cakap ape la...dorang memang sah-sah pendatang..hahahaah!! kawan2 cina ngan india aku gelak...

sejak dulu lagi, sejarah asal Melayu sering dipersoalkan..kenapa boleh terjadi begini? mari kita lihat beberapa teori yang boleh diambil dan teori dari orang bodoh...contohnya, beberapa pemimpin bercakap orang Melayu berasal dari Indon, hanya orang asli sahaja penduduk asal Malaysia...bodoh!! bullshit! tak reti fikir logik langsung...ade ke patut manusia berhijrah dari pulau ke tanah besar...mesti la asal dari tanah besar ke pulau....jadi teori ini ditolak.

jadi hanya tinggal beberapa teori sahaja, tetapi ingin aku imbas kembali teori penghijrahan barat yang mengatakan kewujudan awal manusia, bumi ini kosong dan manusia bergerak dari satu kawasan ke kawasan lain. sebagai contoh, manusia dari tanah melayu berasal dari selatan china, orang-orang eropah berasal dari asia tengah, jadi mengikut teori ini, penduduk asal manusia adalah dari Afrika!!! ya!! kita semua berasal dari Afrika!!!! jadi adakah Melayu sahaja digelar pendatang? sudah tentu tidak! jika sesetengah orang cakap melayu pendatang mengikut teori ini, maka semua bangsa lain juga adalah pendatang!!! kawan2 aku diam sekali lagi..

mari kita lihat dari segi kajian geologi, fossil manusia tertua pernah dijumpai di Malaysia adalah Perak Caveman yang berusia berpuluh-puluh ribu tahun..siapa orang ini? adakah orang asli atau proto Melayu?? menarik persoalan ini. mari kita tengok dulu siapa diri kita iaitu Melayu, dari segi wajah dan warna kulit, bangsa Melayu adalah yang paling versatile!!! kita ada wajah dari muka negro ke muka orang putih!! margin warna kulit kita juga amat besar..dari sehitam2 kaler ke seputih2 kaler!! fuh!! kenapa bleh jadi camni???

sah-sah bangsa Melayu memang dinamik...Melayu mempunyai sejarah panjang sehingga membolehkan margin warna kulit kita luas seperti sekarang. memang Melayu lambat untuk membina empayar di tanah melayu, kerajaan Melayu paling lama muncul kira2 seribu tahun dulu di Kedah Tua dan Langkasuka. ala..cerita raja bersiung tu..

ok.berbalik kepada kerajaan..sebelum melayu...ada lagi tak kerajaan lebih tua muncul di tanah melayu?? ermmmm.....tidak..jadi melayu pelopor kepada tanah ini. sama juga dengan india dan china...mereka yang pertama mencipta kerajaan..jadi diorangla pembuka dan menjadi orang asal, begitu juga Melayu...

kesimpulannya...kenyataan beberapa pemimpin yang bercakap mengatakan melayu juga pendatang adalah kenyataan dari orang bodoh dan orang melayu yang percaya lagi bodoh sebenarnya. sedarlah tanah melayu sebahagian dari NUSANTARA..atau Alam Melayu....jika betul sejarah membenarkan kewujudan negara Nusantara..bangsa2 lain tidak akan mempertikaikan asal orang Melayu.....

kawan2 cina dan india aku terus diam dan bersetuju Melayulah penduduk asal bumi bertuah ini....